• Industries
    • Major Capital Projects
    • Construction and Infrastructure
    • Manufacturing
  • Services
    • Transformation Consultants
    • High Integrity Turnarounds™
    • Safety Consultants
    • Leadership and Organizational Performance
    • High Performance Projects™
    • The School of Coaching
  • Impact
    • What Clients Say
    • Client Results
  • Insights
    • Articles, Blogs & Poetry
    • Press Releases
    • Events
    • Transformation Talks Podcast
    • News
  • People
    • Senior Partners
    • Partners
    • Managing Consultants
    • Board of Directors
    • Founders
  • About Us
    • Our History
    • Our Vision
    • Our Perspective
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Let's Talk

Employers Must Measure Respiratory Threat

Published by Chloe Handley at September 18, 2019
JMJ Associates Logo
Latest News
  • From the Web

Employers Must Measure Respiratory Threat

Latest Blogs

Sep 18, 2019


In a ruling issued Sept. 11, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Respiratory Protection Standard orders that employers appropriately assess all relevant respiratory hazards before deciding if a respirator is needed as well as to select a proper respirator.

The lawsuit began in 2009 when workers’ grievances drew OSHA safety inspectors to the marine vessel repair plants operated in Seward, Alaska, by Seward Ship's Drydock Inc., which at that time performed both drydock and dockside safety repairs and support on ships and barges.

The organization was in the process of completing welding within a ship’s voids (empty compartments designed to add to the vessel’s buoyancy). Respirators had been suggested to the welders voluntarily, but only one had wished to do so.

The site supervisor, who also was the designated “shipyard competent person” and held a marine chemist certification, handled atmospheric examination where production would take place. Before welding began, he tested the voids using a “grab sample,” which gives an immediate analysis from a gas meter.

The tests concluded whether gas levels in the voids were “safe for entry” at the time the inspection was conducted. However, he did not examine for the metals found in welding fumes. The welding fumes present carried iron oxide, manganese, fluorides and barium compounds. Overexposure to them can cause respiratory problems, and overexposure to iron oxide can induce siderosis, commonly known as “iron lung.”

Two of the welders later testified that the air quality in the voids was very poor and reported it as being hazy. The welders registered complaints with OSHA and safety compliance officers discovered there were improper ventilation and visible fumes. They took grab samples to examine for carbon monoxide and assigned personal exposure monitoring devices to two welders.

The inspectors then issued charges for 13 violations for neglecting to sufficiently test the air in the voids, exposing workers to inhalation risks. They concluded that the testing conducted by Seward did not address permissible exposure limits (PELs) for numerous chemicals.

A Decade of Appeals

OSHA appealed to the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC), which after leading briefings from each of the parties concerned, decided to uphold the ALJ’s decision against the agency. OSHA then appealed that judgment to the federal appeals court, which reversed OSHRC and found that OSHA’s understanding of the law and its regulations were true.

The court reasoned that OSHA’s Respiratory Protection Standard orders employers to evaluate potentially dangerous atmospheres to determine whether respirators are needed and in selecting the proper respirator, rather than completing this evaluation after a decision has been made that respirators are required.

In short, the court reversed the commission’s position that evaluation of respiratory risks was needed only after a decision had been made that respirators were required and supported OSHA’s contention that an evaluation of respiratory dangers was needed to resolve whether a respirator was required and then to select the appropriate respirator.

In light of this opinion, employers should re-evaluate their methods for determining when it is reasonable to suspect that an employee may be exposed to harmful densities of airborne contaminants.

Read the source article at EHS Today



David Sparkman | Sep 18, 2019 - In a decision published Sept. 11, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Respiratory Protection Standard requires that employers adequately evaluate all appropriate respiratory hazards before determining if a respirator is required as well as to select an appropriate respirator.

The case began in 2009 when workers’ complaints drew OSHA inspectors to the marine vessel repair facilities operated in Seward, Alaska, by Seward Ship's Drydock Inc., which at that time performed both drydock and dockside repairs and maintenance on ships and barges.

Read the source article at EHS Today


View All Client Results

Capital Projects Client Results
DSME Completes TCO FGP WPMP Fabrication Safely and ahead of Schedule for the Tengizchevroil Expansion Project
DSME Completes
Client Results Manufacturing
Global Manufacturing Corporation Reduces Quality Defects and Improves Bottom-Line Performance
One of the worl
DSHI Fabrication Yards in Korea Builds Strong Safety Culture on TCO FGP Major Capital Project
Client Results Safety
DSHI Fabrication Yards in Korea Builds Strong Safety Culture on TCO FGP Major Capital Project
At Korean fabri
Japanese Engineering & Construction Corporat Achieves Breakthrough Improvement in Safety Performance
Client Results Safety
Japanese Engineering & Construction Corporation Achieves Breakthrough Improvement in Safety Performance
The JGC Corpora
Russian Petroleum Operations Company Achieves a Shift in its Health and Safety Culture
Client Results Safety
Russian Petroleum Operations Company Achieves a Shift in its Health and Safety Culture in 9 Months
SPD had been wo



From the Web

Your Coronavirus Questions, Answered by Experts
Coronavirus From the web
Your Coronavirus Questions, Answered by Experts.
With the coronavirus sending us all indo
coronavirus
From the web
Working from home because of coronavirus? Be careful what you download to keep cybersafe
Welcome to the new normal: working from
Increase engagement through communication
From the web
Increase engagement through communication
Safety training sessions and conducting
In a ruling issued Sept. 11, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Respiratory Protection Standard orders that employers appropriately assess all relevant respiratory hazards before deciding if a respirator is needed as well as to select a proper respirator.

  • Author
Chloe Handley
Chloe Handley Administrator
Chloe Handley has progressed to Global Senior Marketing and Communications Specialist since joining JMJ in 2011. Chloé’s experience spans both agency and in-house; working with brands such as Sodexo, Rics, Neopost, Harley Medical Group, Lancashire Constabulary, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and Coca-Cola. Her experience spans lead generation through digital design and marketing, brand narrative and consistent business and client-focused targeted marketing communications. Chloé’s responsible for managing brand development and marketing and communication strategies across JMJ, helping to drive growth and maintain JMJ’s market lead position. She works with internal teams to develop tailored marketing plans across a range of communications channels – in line with JMJ’s business development objectives.
follow me
JMJ
  • Corporate Headquarters
    Arboretum Plaza One
    9442 N. Capital of Texas Highway, Suite 450,
    Austin, Texas 78759
  • +1 (512) 795-0795
  • Email Us

Industries

  • Rail
  • Construction
  • Manufacturing
  • Energy
  • Mining
  • Logistics
  • Aerospace
  • Water and Environmental

Services

  • Incident and Injury-Free™
  • High Performance Projects™
  • Safety Consultants
  • Leadership and Organizational Performance
  • High Integrity Turnarounds™
  • The School of Coaching

Locations

  • Americas Office – Austin
  • APAC Office – Singapore
  • EMEA Office – London
  • Middle East Office – Doha
  • Kazakhstan Office – Atyrau
  • South Korea Office – Seoul
  • Australia Office – Perth

Connect

  • linkedin
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
Privacy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | Accessibility | Cookie Policy | Feedback | Site Map |

© 2020 JMJ Associates LLP. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of JMJ Associates content or logo, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of JMJ Associates.

    Start Unlocking Human Performance


    Arrange a call with one of our consultants today. Please complete your details below:

    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    This site uses cookies to provide you with a more personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie policy for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.Accept Read More
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled

    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

    Non-necessary

    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.